Manifesto of the Ideal Citizen

In order to mold the ideal citizen into a more desirable, one-dimensional thinker, we must first establish a state capable of creating a conducive environment.

Timing plays a crucial role in the formation of this state. The first approach is more radical and audacious than the second. During times of chaos and division within the state, when the ruler desperately craves absolute power and an external threat looms, they should temporarily step away from the state, as disobedience prevails. In such times, chaos will reign supreme, and the citizens will find themselves in despair, unable to form a coherent state. After a while, they will beseech their former leader to return, but the leader should initially decline. Only when the people willingly grant absolute power should the leader make a triumphant return. Any previous criticisms regarding the leader’s cruelty or decisions will then fall silent, for ultimately, it was the people’s desire for their rule. Subsequently, the leader should maintain an air of honor and not be taken for granted, lest the people lose their respect. Occasional distance or brief absences from the throne are necessary, so that the people may experience the chaos that ensues in their absence, solidifying the leader’s image as a messiah.

The second approach is more subtle and manipulative. Recognizing that people resent being told what to do and feeling powerless, they must be presented with the illusion of choice. By creating two political parties, both under the secret control of one individual, the ruler can divert the public’s attention and sow division. The ruler can present seemingly inconsequential issues, each championed by one of the political parties, while the critical decisions are made at the ruler’s discretion behind closed doors. Alternatively, the ruler can frame important decisions as a choice between two options, ostensibly represented by the political parties. However, this choice is merely an illusion, with one option being blatantly favorable and the other cloaked in a subtle disguise of stupidity. In some cases, a genuine choice can be presented that appeals to a specific minority or like-minded group, ensuring they won’t win the vote but exposing their ideals, further dividing “good” and “bad” citizens and creating a minor scapegoat. In essence, the goal is to render the populace docile by any means necessary, while true decision-making power remains firmly in the hands of the state.